Senayan

  • Home
  • Information
  • News
  • Help
  • Librarian
  • Member Area
  • Select Language :
    Arabic Bengali Brazilian Portuguese English Espanol German Indonesian Japanese Malay Persian Russian Thai Turkish Urdu

Search by :

ALL Author Subject ISBN/ISSN Advanced Search

Last search:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
No image available for this title
Bookmark Share

Video Recording

Abstraction Measurement of Students in Constructing Proof Algebra Problems

Dede Nuraida - Personal Name; Henny Sri astuty - Personal Name;

This study aimed to describe the abstraction of measurement of students in constructing the proof of algebra problems. For this purpose, a qualitative explorative research with task-based interview techniques was conducted. The subjects were the students of math education, class of 2013, UNIROW Tuban. Students who became the subject of research has taken a course of Algebra Structure. Measurement of abstraction used RBC models (Recognizing, Building-with, Constructing). Recognizing refers to the fact, the basic concept which has already known. Building- with refers to the combination of facts or concepts into a new context, and Constructing refers to the ability to build a proof of statement/issue based on facts or concepts to show that the statement is true. The main instrument was the researchers themselves, and the supporting instrument was interview guides that referred to the RBC model. Data were analyzed qualitatively. Conclusions were obtained based on the analysis results, those were: Recognizing, students tended to be able to know a few facts, concepts that supported the evidentiary issues, example: the closed nature, associative, neutral element, inverse of element, grupoid, semigrup, group. Building- with, students tended to be able to combine the concept of the closed nature, associative, neutral element, inverse of element, grupoid, semigrup into new contexts that were interrelated. Constructing, students in constructing proof algebra problems, there were still many steps that were illogical in the use of facts or concepts. Consequently, the proof tended to be incorrect, although conclusion was ultimately correct.


Availability

No copy data

Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
-
Publisher
: .,
Collation
-
Language
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Classification
NONE
Content Type
-
Media Type
-
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Subject(s)
abstraction, recognize, building-with, construct,
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
-
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
No Data
Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment

Senayan
  • Information
  • Services
  • Librarian
  • Member Area

About Us

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Search

start it by typing one or more keywords for title, author or subject

Keep SLiMS Alive Want to Contribute?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Powered by SLiMS
Select the topic you are interested in
  • Computer Science, Information & General Works
  • Philosophy & Psychology
  • Religion
  • Social Sciences
  • Language
  • Pure Science
  • Applied Sciences
  • Art & Recreation
  • Literature
  • History & Geography
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Advanced Search
Where do you want to share?